A review of the fallen timber map and each lot’s restoration note finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the western windfall lots. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one fallen trunk crosses a route used by both wood carriers and pollinator keepers.
The the fallen timber map and each lot’s restoration note lists 96 lots cleared with a mapped regrowth boundary; the previous window lists 90. Aeren Thorn checked both against signed council records checked against the amendments residents submitted. The source was checked against a second copy held by Tiriel Moss. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Carriers need the route reopened. Pollinator keepers ask that the trunk remain until the mapped bloom window closes. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how fallen timber can be removed without erasing the boundary used for regrowth monitoring.
The circle publishes options with the seasonal limits stated beside them. The Year first, canopy height window 3 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The permit desk will mark a route clearance date and a separate bloom review date.
