A review of the upper release marks and household draw requests finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the Mosswell upper brook. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the first channel divides below a root bridge before reaching three shared gardens.
The the upper release marks and household draw requests lists 66 release turns with a paired downstream reading; the previous window lists 67. Aeren Thorn checked both against signed council records checked against the amendments residents submitted. The source was checked against a second copy held by Eryn Vail. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Garden stewards favor the upstream mark. Lower terrace households point to the level that reaches their channel. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how water turns are shared when the upper and lower readings do not move together.
Asecond transect checks the reading against the living site. The Year fifth, rest season window 2 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The brook council will post both marks beside each release window.
