The first file on the river source inspections began with spring flow marks and the sample jars held by two circles. The city then checked the source, heard affected residents and sent a second office to repeat the count.
The current Year second, seedfall window 1 file records 52 samples with a chain of custody from spring to room; the previous window records 47. The longer sequence makes the change visible, while each count remains tied to its own dates.
A turning point was the observation that the same spring feeds a public bath and a teaching plot. It narrowed the discussion from a general claim to a question about how the rule works at the site.
Bath stewards test for safe use. Gardeners also track mineral changes that affect the teaching plot. The shared record is larger than it was at the start, although the parties still assign it different weight.
Stewards post the result alongside the original measurement. The responsible office has begun the follow-up set by the board, which sent one separate question to a later public hearing without reopening this file.
