A decision on the restoration material record should be judged at the west arch at Reed Hall, where the rule changes an ordinary route, shift or service. Compare this season’s measurement with the living site and the people who steward it. The current file is the Year fourth, seedfall window 2 review, not a permanent settlement of every future case.
The the arch repair book and samples held by the public archive lists 23 replacement stones with a recorded source and date; the previous window lists 23. Aeren Thorn checked both against signed council records checked against the amendments residents submitted. The difference matters because how a repair can preserve safety while making new material visible in the public record.
Masons prioritize a stable joint. Conservators want later readers to distinguish repair from original work. Those objections deserve a clear answer. They are not a reason to keep an uncheckable rule simply because its wording is familiar.
A useful decision names who will do the work, which count will change and when the result comes back to the public table. In this case, the repair uses a newer aggregate than the original arch.
The Year fourth, seedfall window 2 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The archive will attach the repair date and source sample to the arch record.
