A review of map copies, spoken-name notes and the public search index finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the map table at Lethariel’s west archive. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one bend is named differently by the river circle and the west hall.
The map copies, spoken-name notes and the public search index lists 95 entries with a source and a searchable local variant; the previous window lists 95. Sylva Reed checked both against field transects paired with the season and location of each reading. The source was checked against a second copy held by Vela Thorne. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Mappers favor one printed label. Residents want the name used at home to remain searchable. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a public map can carry both names without confusing travelers.
The council records a decision for this site and review window. The board recorded the outcome that it closed the file after a second measure confirmed the existing threshold.
