A decision on the grove water cut should be judged at the east grove feeder channel, where the rule changes an ordinary route, shift or service. Compare this season’s measurement with the living site and the people who steward it. The current file is the Year fourth, budbreak window 1 review, not a permanent settlement of every future case.
The the channel level book and the downstream moisture readings lists 70 readings taken at the same root markers; the previous window lists 67. Sylva Reed checked both against field transects paired with the season and location of each reading. The difference matters because how the seasonal cut is timed when two branches reach their wet period at different times.
The upper steward favors a shared calendar date. The east circle wants the cut tied to its own readings. Those objections deserve a clear answer. They are not a reason to keep an uncheckable rule simply because its wording is familiar.
A useful decision names who will do the work, which count will change and when the result comes back to the public table. In this case, the east branch receives meltwater two days later than the upper branch.
The Year fourth, budbreak window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The water circle will compare two dates against the same root markers.
