A review of the use calendar and permits held by the neighboring circles finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the shared meadow below the western canopy. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the meadow hosts both seasonal craft gatherings and a monitored seed rest.
The the use calendar and permits held by the neighboring circles lists 20 permits with a restoration plan attached; the previous window lists 23. Lyra Ash checked both against visits to the workshop or room alongside interviews with its users. The source was checked against a second copy held by Mira Elowen. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Gatherers say a shared calendar should remain flexible. Stewards say a rest period needs a date that cannot be displaced by a late booking. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how public use can continue while a particular patch is left undisturbed.
Anew seasonal file opens with a named site and a dated measure. The Year fourth, rest season window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The permit desk will mark the rest period on the same calendar as public events.
