A decision on the canopy council seats should be judged at the open table at Elder Ash Hall, where the rule changes an ordinary route, shift or service. Compare this season’s measurement with the living site and the people who steward it. The current file is the Year fifth, budbreak window 2 review, not a permanent settlement of every future case.
The the seat register, speaking queue and amendment leaves lists 84 amendments read before a vote; the previous window lists 90. Aeren Thorn checked both against signed council records checked against the amendments residents submitted. The difference matters because how a shared seat can give each neighborhood time to review a measure before a vote.
The council counts one seat. The two neighborhoods say one season is not enough time for both to hear from residents. Those objections deserve a clear answer. They are not a reason to keep an uncheckable rule simply because its wording is familiar.
A useful decision names who will do the work, which count will change and when the result comes back to the public table. In this case, one rotating seat is shared by two neighborhoods for a full season.
The board closed this docket after it retained the current practice and published the evidence for doing so. The next window starts with a fresh record.
