A review of the seat register, speaking queue and amendment leaves finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the open table at Elder Ash Hall. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one rotating seat is shared by two neighborhoods for a full season.
The the seat register, speaking queue and amendment leaves lists 25 amendments read before a vote; the previous window lists 28. Aeren Thorn checked both against signed council records checked against the amendments residents submitted. The source was checked against a second copy held by Aeren Thorn. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The council counts one seat. The two neighborhoods say one season is not enough time for both to hear from residents. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a shared seat can give each neighborhood time to review a measure before a vote.
The steward attaches the original field record and the last method note. The Year first, seedfall window 2 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The clerk will record speaking time and submitted amendments separately for the next sitting.
