A review of the apprenticeship book and samples signed at the bench finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the joinery bench at Fern Hall. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the standard test uses the same joint even when the apprentice specializes elsewhere.
The the apprenticeship book and samples signed at the bench lists 24 skills assessed with a dated sample from more than one project; the previous window lists 27. Lyra Ash checked both against visits to the workshop or room alongside interviews with its users. The source was checked against a second copy held by Nerin Thal. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Masters value a common comparison. Apprentices want the book to include work they completed in a real commission. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide whether one standard test describes a craft learned across several kinds of work.
Anew seasonal file opens with a named site and a dated measure. The Year third, rest season window 3 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The bench will test a portfolio page beside the existing joint test.
